論文

査読有り
2017年7月

Enhancing the discussion of alternatives in EIA using principle component analysis leads to improved public involvement

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW
  • Tetsuya Kamijo
  • ,
  • Guangwei Huang

65
開始ページ
63
終了ページ
74
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1016/j.eiar.2017.04.009
出版者・発行元
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC

The purpose of this study is to show the effectiveness of principle component analysis (PCA) as a method of alternatives analysis useful for improving the discussion of alternatives and public involvement. This study examined public consultations by applying quantitative text analysis (QTA) to the minutes of meetings and showed a positive correlation between the discussion of alternatives and the sense of public involvement. The discussion of alternatives may improve public involvement. A table of multiple criteria analysis for alternatives with detailed scores may exclude the public from involvement due to the general public's limited capacity to understand the mathematical algorithm and to process too much information. PCA allowed for the reduction of multiple criteria down to a small number of uncorrelated variables (principle components), a display of the merits and demerits of the alternatives, and potentially made the identification of preferable alternatives by the stakeholders easier. PCA is likely to enhance the discussion of alternatives and as a result, lead to improved public involvement.

Web of Science ® 被引用回数 : 2

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.04.009
Web of Science
https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=JSTA_CEL&SrcApp=J_Gate_JST&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=WOS:000403513600007&DestApp=WOS_CPL

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS