論文

国際誌
2021年6月26日

Technical Note: Range verification of pulsed proton beams from fixed-field alternating gradient accelerator by means of time-of-flight measurement of ionoacoustic waves.

Medical physics
  • Yuta Nakamura
  • Taisuke Takayanagi
  • Tomoki Uesaka
  • Mehmet Burcin Unlu
  • Yasutoshi Kuriyama
  • Yoshihiro Ishi
  • Tomonori Uesugi
  • Masanori Kobayashi
  • Nobuki Kudo
  • Sodai Tanaka
  • Kikuo Umegaki
  • Satoshi Tomioka
  • Taeko Matsuura
  • 全て表示

48
9
開始ページ
5490
終了ページ
5500
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1002/mp.15060

PURPOSE: Ionoacoustics is one of the promising approaches to verify the beam range in proton therapy. However, the weakness of the wave signal remains a main hindrance to its application in clinics. Here we studied the potential use of a fixed-field alternating gradient accelerator (FFA), one of the accelerator candidates for future proton therapy. For such end, magnitude of the pressure wave and range accuracy achieved by the short-pulsed beam of FFA were assessed, using both simulation and experimental procedure. METHODS: A 100 MeV proton beam from the FFA was applied on a water phantom, through the acrylic wall. The beam range measured by the Bragg peak (BP)-ionization chamber (BPC) was 77.6 mm, while the maximum dose at BP was estimated to be 0.35 Gy/pulse. A hydrophone was placed 20 mm downstream of the BP, and signals were amplified and stored by a digital oscilloscope, averaged, and low-pass filtered. Time-of-flight (TOF) and two relative TOF values were analyzed in order to determine the beam range. Furthermore, an acoustic wave transport simulation was conducted to estimate the amplitude of the pressure waves. RESULTS: The range calculated when using two relative TOF was 78.16 ± 0.01 and 78.14 ± 0.01 mm, respectively, both values being coherent with the range measured by the BPC (the difference was 0.5-0.6 mm). In contrast, utilizing the direct TOF resulted in a range error of 1.8 mm. Fivefold and 50-fold averaging were required to suppress the range variation to below 1 mm for TOF and relative TOF measures, respectively. The simulation suggested the magnitude of pressure wave at the detector exceeded 7 Pascal. CONCLUSION: A submillimeter range accuracy was attained with a pulsed beam of about 21 ns from an FFA, at a clinical energy using relative TOF. To precisely quantify the range with a single TOF measurement, subsequent improvement in the measuring system is required.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15060
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34173991
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1002/mp.15060
  • PubMed ID : 34173991

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS