2013年1月
Comparison of DSM-IV versus proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for eating disorders in a Japanese sample.
European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association
- ,
- ,
- ,
- ,
- 巻
- 21
- 号
- 1
- 開始ページ
- 8
- 終了ページ
- 14
- 記述言語
- 英語
- 掲載種別
- 研究論文(学術雑誌)
- DOI
- 10.1002/erv.2203
- 出版者・発行元
- WILEY-BLACKWELL
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) and the proposed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria in terms of the number of cases of eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) and to see which diagnostic system can effectively capture variance in psychiatric symptoms in a Japanese sample. METHOD: One thousand and twenty-nine women with an eating disorder (ED) participated in this study. Assessment methods included structured clinical interviews and administration of the Eating Attitudes Test and the Eating Disorder Inventory. RESULTS: Relaxing the diagnostic criteria for anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa and recognizing binge ED decreased the proportion of EDNOS (from 45.1% to 26.1%). The DSM-5 categorization of patients was better able to capture variance in psychopathology scales. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed revisions to EDs in the DSM-5 partially reduced reliance on EDNOS. The DSM-5 may differentiate ED groups more effectively than the DSM-IV.
- リンク情報
- ID情報
-
- DOI : 10.1002/erv.2203
- ISSN : 1072-4133
- PubMed ID : 23059695
- Web of Science ID : WOS:000312245400002