論文

査読有り 国際誌
2019年8月

A Prospective, Randomized Phase II Study of Adjuvant Gemcitabine Versus S-1 After Major Hepatectomy for Biliary Tract Cancer (KHBO 1208): Kansai Hepato-Biliary Oncology Group.

Annals of surgery
  • Shogo Kobayashi
  • Hiroaki Nagano
  • Akira Tomokuni
  • Kunihito Gotoh
  • Daisuke Sakai
  • Etsuro Hatano
  • Satoru Seo
  • Hiroaki Terajima
  • Yoichiro Uchida
  • Tetsuo Ajiki
  • Hironaga Satake
  • Keiko Kamei
  • Taiji Tohyama
  • Tetsuro Hirose
  • Iwao Ikai
  • Satoshi Morita
  • Tatsuya Ioka
  • 全て表示

270
2
開始ページ
230
終了ページ
237
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1097/SLA.0000000000002865

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate each arm independently and compare adjuvant gemcitabine (GEM) and S-1 chemotherapy after major hepatectomy (hemihepatectomy or trisectionectomy) for biliary tract cancer (BTC). BACKGROUND: Standardized adjuvant therapy is not performed after major hepatectomy for BTC, and we determined the recommended dose in the former study (KHBO1003). METHODS: We performed a multicenter, randomized phase II study. The primary measure was 1-year recurrence-free survival (RFS); the secondary measures were other RFS, overall survival (OS), and others. The following 6-month adjuvant chemotherapy was administered within 12 weeks of R0/1: GEM (1000 mg/m) every 2 weeks; or S-1 (80 mg/m/d) for 28 days every 6 weeks. Thirty-five patients were assigned to each arm (alpha error, 10%; beta error, 20%). RESULTS: No patients were excluded for the per-protocol analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in the patient characteristics of the 2 arms. The 1-year RFS and 1-year OS rates of the GEM arm were 51.4% and 80.0%, respectively, whereas those of the S-1 group were 62.9% and 97.1%. The comparison of the 2 arms revealed that 2-year RFS rate, 1 and 2-year OS rates, and OS curve of the S-1 arm were superior to GEM. With regard to OS, the hazard ratio of the S-1 group was 0.477 (90% confidence interval 0.245-0.927). CONCLUSION: The comparison of the survival of the 2 groups revealed that adjuvant S-1 therapy may be superior to adjuvant GEM therapy after major hepatectomy for BTC.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002865
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30339627
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002865
  • ISSN : 0003-4932
  • PubMed ID : 30339627

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS