論文

査読有り 国際誌
2019年7月10日

The impact of age on the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving therapy in breast cancer patients with a > 5 mm margin treated without boost irradiation.

Radiation oncology (London, England)
  • Yuka Ono
  • ,
  • Michio Yoshimura
  • ,
  • Kimiko Hirata
  • ,
  • Chikako Yamauchi
  • ,
  • Masakazu Toi
  • ,
  • Eiji Suzuki
  • ,
  • Masahiro Takada
  • ,
  • Masahiro Hiraoka
  • ,
  • Takashi Mizowaki

14
1
開始ページ
121
終了ページ
121
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1186/s13014-019-1327-8

BACKGROUND: The boost irradiation to the tumor bed following whole-breast irradiation (WBI) reduced the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). However, in Japan, almost all patients with a margin ≤5 mm receive boost irradiation to the tumor bed, but the decision to perform boost irradiation for those with a margin > 5 mm is dependent on the institution. Thus, institutional guidelines on utilizing boost irradiation for patients aged ≤40 or ≤ 50 years vary. We investigated the IBTR rate to assess the appropriate age for boost irradiation to the tumor bed with a margin > 5 mm. METHODS: From January 1993 to December 2010, 419 patients with early-stage breast cancer and negative margins (> 5 mm) after breast-conserving surgery received WBI without boost irradiation. The Gray test was used to compare the cumulative incidence of IBTR among patients aged ≤40, 41-50, and ≥ 51 years. Hazard ratios were estimated using the Fine and Gray models. Furthermore, as a subgroup analysis, we investigated whether IBTR depended on the use of systemic therapy, such as anthracycline or taxane regimens. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 9.3 years. In multivariate analysis, only age predicted IBTR (p = 0.047). The 10-year IBTR rate was 15.7% in patients aged ≤40, 3.8% in those aged 41-50, and 2.0% in patients aged ≥51 years. The difference between patients aged ≤40 and 41-50 years was statistically significant (p = 0.045), whereas the difference between patients aged 41-50 and ≥ 51 years was not significant (p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: In our institutional surgical setting, when boost irradiation is performed only for patients with a margin ≤5 mm, the IBTR rate after WBI without boost irradiation was significantly higher in patients aged ≤40 years, suggesting that boost irradiation should be used for patients in this age group.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1327-8
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31291997
PubMed Central
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6617854
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1186/s13014-019-1327-8
  • PubMed ID : 31291997
  • PubMed Central 記事ID : PMC6617854

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS