論文

査読有り 筆頭著者 責任著者
2019年9月

Differences of precursory seismic energy release for the 2007 effusive dome-forming and 2014 Plinian eruptions at Kelud volcano, Indonesia

JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH
  • Haruhisa Nakamichi
  • ,
  • Masato Iguchi
  • ,
  • Hetty Triastuty
  • ,
  • Muhamad Hendrasto
  • ,
  • Iyan Mulyana

382
開始ページ
68
終了ページ
80
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.08.004
出版者・発行元
ELSEVIER

Early warnings of the timing, style, and size of volcanic eruptions, made on the basis of seismic monitoring, are important for mitigation of the hazards associated with volcanic eruptions. We calculated the rates of seismic energy release at Kelud volcano, Indonesia, preceding both the 2007 effusive lava-dome eruption and the 2014 Plinian eruption. For the 2007 eruption, there was first a step-wise increase in the rate of release of seismic energy, followed by a gradual decrease until the eruption. For the 2014 eruption, the rate of energy release was almost constant until 10 days before the eruption, then gradually increased until there was a dramatic acceleration during the last day before the eruption. The total seismic energy released by the 2007 and 2014 eruptions were 3 x 10(8)J, and 22 x 10(9)J, respectively. The relative difference between the ejected volumes of the 2007 and 2014 eruptions is roughly equivalent to that of the total seismic energy released preceding the eruptions. We conducted several trials of the material failure forecast method (FFM), applying it to the square root of the rate of seismic energy released, to assess its usefulness for predicting the timing of eruptions. The predicted onset of the 2007 eruption was one day earlier than the actual eruption and the seismic energy release preceding the actual eruption did not increase dramatically as suggested by the FFM model. Several trials of FFM for the 2014 eruption predicted the onset of the eruption to be three days to two weeks later than the actual eruption. Even as the end time of the FFM time window approaches several hours to 10 min before the actual eruption onset, the predicted eruption onset is still 3 h later than the actual onset. Thus, the results of our FFM modeling did not show the method to be useful for predicting eruption times for Kelud volcano. The differences of the FFM modeling results for the 2007 and 2014 eruptions likely reflect the differences in the rate of energy release immediately before the two eruptions: a deceleration before the 2007 eruption and an acceleration before the 2014 eruption. These differences may reflect differences in precursory processes for effusive lava-dome and Plinian eruptions. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.08.004
Web of Science
https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=JSTA_CEL&SrcApp=J_Gate_JST&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=WOS:000491639000006&DestApp=WOS_CPL
共同研究・競争的資金等の研究課題
火山構造性地震によるマグマ貫入量と噴火時刻の推定手法の確立に向けての試み
共同研究・競争的資金等の研究課題
火山噴出物の放出に伴う災害の軽減に関する総合的研究
URL
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85027435081&origin=inward
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.08.004
  • ISSN : 0377-0273
  • eISSN : 1872-6097
  • ORCIDのPut Code : 47343074
  • SCOPUS ID : 85027435081
  • Web of Science ID : WOS:000491639000006

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS