論文

査読有り
2024年11月18日

Accuracy of diagnostic tests for perilymphatic fistula: protocol for a systematic review

Frontiers in Neurology
  • Maksym Situkho
  • ,
  • Tetsuo Ikezono
  • ,
  • Marte Myhrum
  • ,
  • Arne Kirkhorn Rødvik
  • ,
  • Yukihide Maeda
  • ,
  • Han Matsuda
  • ,
  • Masafumi Sawada
  • ,
  • Greg Eigner Jablonski

15
記述言語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.3389/fneur.2024.1500780
出版者・発行元
Frontiers Media SA

Perilymphatic fistula (PLF) is a challenging inner ear condition, characterized by the abnormal connection between inner and middle ear and subsequent leakage of inner ear liquid (perilymph) into the middle ear. Early surgical intervention for PLF might lead to favorable audiological and vestibular outcomes. The conventional reference standard of PLF detection is the intraoperative visualization of perilymph leakage during explorative tympanotomy or endoscopic inspection; the specificity and sensitivity of this method is unknown. Systematic reviews assessing the accuracy of diagnostic tests for PLF are not available.

Objective

To systematically review the literature for qualitative evidence exploring the diagnostic tests for the PLF diagnosis. The proposed systematic review will answer the following question: What is the accuracy of diagnostic tests in detecting perilymphatic fistula in humans?

Methods

Eligibility criteria: original peer-reviewed articles regarding studies on humans of any age containing data with diagnostic test accuracy estimation (sensitivity and specificity) for PLF diagnosis or in which diagnostic test accuracy could be calculated based on data provided, without language, study design or study date limits. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science will be searched for eligible articles. Additional manual searches will be performed. Covidence software will be used for title and abstract screening, full text review and data extraction. The risk of bias assessment will be conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Test Accuracy 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. If two or more high-quality articles evaluating the same diagnostic test will be identified, their findings will be quantitatively synthesized; if a quantitative synthesis is not feasible, the results will be described in a narrative summary. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework will be used to evaluate evidence strength. Study funded by Oslo University Hospital.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1500780
URL
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1500780/full
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.3389/fneur.2024.1500780
  • eISSN : 1664-2295

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS