論文

国際誌
2014年5月

Factor associated with failure to administer subsequent treatment after progression in the first-line chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group experience.

Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology
  • Yuka Kato
  • Katsuyuki Hotta
  • Nagio Takigawa
  • Naoyuki Nogami
  • Toshiyuki Kozuki
  • Akiko Sato
  • Eiki Ichihara
  • Kenichiro Kudo
  • Isao Oze
  • Masahiro Tabata
  • Tetsu Shinkai
  • Mitsune Tanimoto
  • Katsuyuki Kiura
  • 全て表示

73
5
開始ページ
943
終了ページ
50
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1007/s00280-014-2425-9
出版者・発行元
SPRINGER

PURPOSE: Early administration of both epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy is crucial for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR mutations. We investigated the effect of first-line administration of these therapies on subsequent therapy in NSCLC patients. METHODS: This study enrolled 63 consecutive patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC and good performance status (PS) and who underwent first-line EGFR-TKI therapy or standard cytotoxic chemotherapy and then had progressive disease, from 2007 to 2011. The ability of each patient to receive the other therapy after first-line treatment failure was assessed. RESULTS: In the first-line setting, 23 and 40 patients received EGFR-TKI therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy, respectively. At relapse, the EGFR-TKI therapy group showed more frequent PS deterioration (p = 0.042) and greater likelihood of symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) relapse (p = 0.093) compared with the cytotoxic chemotherapy group. Nine (39 %) of 23 patients initially receiving EGFR-TKI therapy could not receive standard cytotoxic therapy after progression mainly due to symptomatic CNS relapse. Only one (3 %) of 40 initially treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy failed to receive subsequent EGFR-TKI therapy (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed a correlation between the first-line therapy and the failure to switch to the other therapy after disease progression (OR 48.605, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: In this study, patients who could not receive both EGFR-TKI therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy in the early-line setting were included more in the first-line EGFR-TKI group, suggesting a potential risk associated with missing the timing of administration of subsequent therapy. Further investigation is warranted to detect their pretreatment clinical or molecular characteristics for development of a new treatment strategy specific for such subpopulation.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-014-2425-9
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24633759
Web of Science
https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=JSTA_CEL&SrcApp=J_Gate_JST&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=WOS:000335391500009&DestApp=WOS_CPL
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1007/s00280-014-2425-9
  • ISSN : 0344-5704
  • eISSN : 1432-0843
  • PubMed ID : 24633759
  • Web of Science ID : WOS:000335391500009

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS