論文

国際誌
2021年8月17日

Empirical versus theoretical power and type I error (false-positive) rates estimated from real murine aging research data.

Cell reports
  • Irene Alfaras
  • Keisuke Ejima
  • Camila Vieira Ligo Teixeira
  • Clara Di Germanio
  • Sarah J Mitchell
  • Samuel Hamilton
  • Luigi Ferrucci
  • Nathan L Price
  • David B Allison
  • Michel Bernier
  • Rafael de Cabo
  • 全て表示

36
7
開始ページ
109560
終了ページ
109560
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109560

We assess the degree of phenotypic variation in a cohort of 24-month-old male C57BL/6 mice. Because murine studies often use small sample sizes, if the commonly relied upon assumption of a normal distribution of residuals is not met, it may inflate type I error rates. In this study, 3-20 mice are resampled from the empirical distributions of 376 mice to create plasmodes, an approach for computing type I error rates and power for commonly used statistical tests without assuming a normal distribution of residuals. While all of the phenotypic and metabolic variables studied show considerable variability, the number of animals required to achieve adequate power is markedly different depending on the statistical test being performed. Overall, this work provides an analysis with which researchers can make informed decisions about the sample size required to achieve statistical power from specific measurements without a priori assumptions of a theoretical distribution.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109560
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34407413
PubMed Central
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8449850
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109560
  • PubMed ID : 34407413
  • PubMed Central 記事ID : PMC8449850

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS