論文

査読有り 国際誌
2018年5月

Quality assurance of geometric accuracy based on an electronic portal imaging device and log data analysis for Dynamic WaveArc irradiation.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics
  • Hideaki Hirashima
  • ,
  • Yuki Miyabe
  • ,
  • Mitsuhiro Nakamura
  • ,
  • Nobutaka Mukumoto
  • ,
  • Takashi Mizowaki
  • ,
  • Masahiro Hiraoka

19
3
開始ページ
234
終了ページ
242
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1002/acm2.12324

The purpose of this study was to develop a simple verification method for the routine quality assurance (QA) of Dynamic WaveArc (DWA) irradiation using electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images and log data analysis. First, an automatic calibration method utilizing the outermost multileaf collimator (MLC) slits was developed to correct the misalignment between the center of the EPID and the beam axis. Moreover, to verify the detection accuracy of the MLC position according to the EPID images, various positions of the MLC with intentional errors in the range 0.1-1 mm were assessed. Second, to validate the geometric accuracy during DWA irradiation, tests were designed in consideration of three indices. Test 1 evaluated the accuracy of the MLC position. Test 2 assessed dose output consistency with variable dose rate (160-400 MU/min), gantry speed (2.2-6°/s), and ring speed (0.5-2.7°/s). Test 3 validated dose output consistency with variable values of the above parameters plus MLC speed (1.6-4.2 cm/s). All tests were delivered to the EPID and compared with those obtained using a stationary radiation beam with a 0° gantry angle. Irradiation log data were recorded simultaneously. The 0.1-mm intentional error on the MLC position could be detected by the EPID, which is smaller than the EPID pixel size. In Test 1, the MLC slit widths agreed within 0.20 mm of their exposed values. The averaged root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the dose outputs was less than 0.8% in Test 2 and Test 3. Using log data analysis in Test 3, the RMSE between the planned and recorded data was 0.1 mm, 0.12°, and 0.07° for the MLC position, gantry angle, and ring angle, respectively. The proposed method is useful for routine QA of the accuracy of DWA.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12324
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29633542
PubMed Central
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978977
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1002/acm2.12324
  • PubMed ID : 29633542
  • PubMed Central 記事ID : PMC5978977

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS