論文

査読有り 国際誌
2020年5月31日

Reporting Guidelines for Community-Based Participatory Research Did Not Improve the Reporting Quality of Published Studies: A Systematic Review of Studies on Smoking Cessation.

International journal of environmental research and public health
  • Daisuke Kato
  • ,
  • Yuki Kataoka
  • ,
  • Erfen Gustiawan Suwangto
  • ,
  • Makoto Kaneko
  • ,
  • Hideki Wakabayashi
  • ,
  • Daisuke Son
  • ,
  • Ichiro Kawachi

17
11
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.3390/ijerph17113898

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a 2010 community-based participatory research (CBPR) reporting guideline on the quality of reporting a CBPR on smoking cessation. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases and included articles published up to December 2019 (PROSPERO: CRD42019111668). We assessed reporting quality using the 13-item checklist. Of the 80 articles identified, 42 (53%) were published after 2010. The overall reporting quality before and after 2010 was poor and did not differ significantly (mean difference: 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.21 to 1.53). The total reporting scores of the studies did not differ significantly according to the effect size of the intervention (beta coefficient: -2.86, 95% CI: -5.77 to 0.04). This study demonstrates the need to improve the quality of reporting CBPRs. We recommend that journal editors endorse the CBPR reporting guideline to encourage its use by more researchers.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113898
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32486372
PubMed Central
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312250
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.3390/ijerph17113898
  • PubMed ID : 32486372
  • PubMed Central 記事ID : PMC7312250

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS