論文

査読有り
1995年

Diagnostic Accuracy of Laparoscopic Liver Biopsy in Chronic Liver Diseases, Comparison of Laparoscopic and US‐Guided Liver Biopsy Results

Digestive Endoscopy
  • Toshio ITO
  • Minora UKIDA
  • Kazuhide YAMAMOTO
  • Haruhiko KOBASHI
  • Youichi MORIMOTO
  • Masayuki MIKAMI
  • Masaki OMOTO
  • Sousuke NAKANISHI
  • Kanji SHINMEN
  • Takuya NAGANO
  • Seiji MATSUMOTO
  • Masaki NAKAMURA
  • Ryoichi OKAMOTO
  • Shin‐ichi FUJIOKA
  • Nobuhiko OMORI
  • Kozo UJIKE
  • Hidenori SHIRAHA
  • Takao TSUJI
  • 全て表示

7
3
開始ページ
261
終了ページ
265
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1111/j.1443-1661.1995.tb00172.x

Liver biopsies were carried out using three different needles, a Vim‐Silverman needle 2.5 mm in outer caliber, an 18‐Gauge (18G) Majima needle, and a 17‐Gauge (17G) Majima needle. The biopsies were obtained from nearby locations on the liver surface under laparoscopic observation, to ascertain differences in histological diagnosis according to the size of the biopsy specimen. The biopsy specimens obtained with the Vim‐Silverman needle were wider than those obtained with the other two needles. The agreement in histological diagnoses of the liver, obtained with the Vim‐Silverman needle versus the 18G Majima needle, was 26.0%, while that between the Vim‐Silverman needle and the 17G Majima needle was 40.0%. Histological diagnosis tended to be underestimated in small biopsy specimens in advanced chronic liver diseases. A questionnaire survey, conducted in 92 hospitals affiliated with Okayama University Medical School, revealed US‐guided liver biopsy to be the practice of choice in 57 of 92 (62.0%) hospitals, and 18G needles were used in US‐guided liver biopsy in 35 of 78 (45.2%) hospitals. Copyright © 1995, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1443-1661.1995.tb00172.x
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1111/j.1443-1661.1995.tb00172.x
  • ISSN : 1443-1661
  • ISSN : 0915-5635
  • SCOPUS ID : 0029097997

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS