論文

査読有り 本文へのリンクあり 国際誌
2020年1月

Public location and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the public-access defibrillation era in Japan

Journal of Cardiology
  • Daisuke Kobayashi
  • Junya Sado
  • Kosuke Kiyohara
  • Tetsuhisa Kitamura
  • Takeyuki Kiguchi
  • Chika Nishiyama
  • Satoe Okabayashi
  • Tomonari Shimamoto
  • Tasuku Matsuyama
  • Takashi Kawamura
  • Taku Iwami
  • 全て表示

75
1
開始ページ
97
終了ページ
104
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.06.005

© 2019 Japanese College of Cardiology Background: The use of public-access automated external defibrillators (AEDs) has become common in Japan. To provide a strategy for appropriate public-access AED deployment, we assessed public-access defibrillation (PAD) by laypersons and the outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) among adult patients by location of arrest. Methods: From a nationwide, prospective, population-based registry of patients after OHCA in Japan, we enrolled adult patients with bystander-witnessed OHCA of medical origin in public locations between 2013 and 2015. The primary outcome measure was one-month favorable neurological outcome defined by cerebral performance category 1 or 2. Factors associated with favorable neurological outcome after ventricular fibrillation (VF) were assessed by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 20,970 adult bystander-witnessed OHCAs of medical origin occurred in public locations. Of those, the proportions of PAD by location were: 13.1% (757/5761) in public areas, 15.9% (333/2089) at workplaces, 26.0% (544/2095) in recreation/sports areas, 36.1% (112/310) in educational institutions, and 5.8% (241/4151) on streets/highways. In a multivariable analysis of VF arrests, both bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation [adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 1.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.54–2.07] and PAD (AOR, 2.33; 95% CI, 2.05–2.66), and emergency medical service (EMS) response time (AOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.87–0.90) were associated with improved outcomes. Earlier PAD initiated by bystanders before EMS arrival was also associated with better outcomes after OHCA. Conclusions: In Japan, where public-access AEDs are well-disseminated, the PAD program worked effectively for adult OHCA of medical origin occurring in public locations. Notably, the proportions of PAD differed substantially according to specific public locations.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.06.005
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31350130
Scopus
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85069656776&origin=inward 本文へのリンクあり
Scopus Citedby
https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85069656776&origin=inward
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.06.005
  • ISSN : 0914-5087
  • eISSN : 1876-4738
  • PubMed ID : 31350130
  • SCOPUS ID : 85069656776

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS