2012年12月11日
Chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with public-access defibrillation: A nationwide cohort study
Circulation
- 巻
- 126
- 号
- 24
- 開始ページ
- 2844
- 終了ページ
- 2851
- 記述言語
- 掲載種別
- 研究論文(学術雑誌)
- DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.109504
BACKGROUND: It remains unclear which is more effective to increase survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in those with public-access defibrillation, bystander-initiated chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or conventional CPR with rescue breathing. METHODS AND RESULTS: A nationwide, prospective, population-based observational study covering the whole population of Japan and involving consecutive out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with resuscitation attempts has been conducted since 2005. We enrolled all out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of presumed cardiac origin that were witnessed and received shocks with public-access automated external defibrillation (AEDs) by bystanders from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2009. The main outcome measure was neurologically favorable 1-month survival. We compared outcomes by type of bystander-initiated CPR (chest compression-only CPR and conventional CPR with compressions and rescue breathing). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the type of CPR and a better neurological outcome. During the 5 years, 1376 bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of cardiac origin in individuals who received CPR and shocks with public-access AEDs by bystanders were registered. Among them, 506 (36.8%) received chest compression-only CPR and 870 (63.2%) received conventional CPR. The chest compression-only CPR group (40.7%, 206 of 506) had a significantly higher rate of 1-month survival with favorable neurological outcome than the conventional CPR group (32.9%, 286 of 870; adjusted odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.70). CONCLUSIONS: Compression-only CPR is more effective than conventional CPR for patients in whom out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is witnessed and shocked with public-access defibrillation. Compression-only CPR is the most likely scenario in which lay rescuers can witness a sudden collapse and use public-access AEDs. © 2012 American Heart Association, Inc.
- リンク情報
-
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.109504
- PubMed
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23230315
- Scopus
- https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84870865442&origin=inward 本文へのリンクあり
- Scopus Citedby
- https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84870865442&origin=inward
- ID情報
-
- DOI : 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.109504
- ISSN : 0009-7322
- eISSN : 1524-4539
- PubMed ID : 23230315
- SCOPUS ID : 84870865442