論文

国際誌
2022年10月4日

Comparison of Bivalirudin Versus Heparin for Anticoagulation During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)
  • Daisuke Hasegawa
  • ,
  • Ryota Sato
  • ,
  • Narut Prasitlumkum
  • ,
  • Kazuki Nishida
  • ,
  • Brian Keaton
  • ,
  • Samuel O Acquah
  • ,
  • Young Im Lee

69
4
開始ページ
396
終了ページ
401
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1097/MAT.0000000000001814

The effect and safety of bivalirudin compared with heparin in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of heparin and bivalirudin in patients who underwent ECMO. We searched Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and MEDLINE. Inclusion criteria included patients (1) undergoing ECMO and (2) receiving bivalirudin or heparin. We excluded studies where the majority of patients switched heparin to bivalirudin or vice versa during the clinical course. The primary outcome was short-term mortality. We presented the results of all analyses with the use of random-effects models. Eleven studies reported short-term mortality. The use of bivalirudin was associated with significantly lower short-term mortality, compared with heparin (odds ratio: 0.71, 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.92; p = 0.01, I2 = 7%). In this meta-analysis of observational studies, the use of bivalirudin was associated with significantly lower short-term mortality, compared with heparin. Further prospective studies are warranted to clarify this finding.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001814
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36194483
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001814
  • PubMed ID : 36194483

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS