論文

査読有り 筆頭著者 国際誌
2019年4月

Immediate effects of thoracic spine self-mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial.

Journal of bodywork and movement therapies
  • Koji Nakamaru
  • ,
  • Junya Aizawa
  • ,
  • Keizo Kawarada
  • ,
  • Yukari Uemura
  • ,
  • Takayuki Koyama
  • ,
  • Osamu Nitta

23
2
開始ページ
417
終了ページ
424
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.05.008

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the immediate effects of thoracic spine self-mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. BACKGROUND: Thoracic spine self-mobilization is performed after thoracic spine thrust manipulation to augment and maintain its effects. To the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated the effects of thoracic spine self-mobilization alone in individuals with mechanical neck pain. The purpose of this randomized, controlled trial was to evaluate the immediate effects of thoracic spine self-mobilization alone without any other intervention on disability, pain, and cervical range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain. METHODS: Fifty-two patients (39 females and 13 males) with mechanical neck pain were randomly allocated to either a thoracic spine self-mobilization group that was performing a thoracic spine active flexion and extension activity using two tennis balls fixed by athletic tape or a placebo thoracic spine self-mobilization group. Outcome measures were collected at pre-intervention and immediately after intervention, including the Neck Disability Index, visual analogue scale, and active cervical range of motion (ROM). The immediate effect of the intervention was analyzed using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). If interactions were found, a simple main effect test was performed to compare the pre-post intra-group results. RESULTS: The results of two-way repeated measures ANOVA indicated that the main effect of time was significant (p < 0.05) for all measurement outcomes. The main effect of group was not significant for all measurement outcomes (p > 0.05). The group × time interactions for cervical flexion active ROM (p = 0.005) and cervical extension active ROM (p = 0.036) were significant. The tests of simple main effect in cervical flexion active ROM (p < 0.0001) and cervical extension active ROM (p < 0.0001) showed a significant difference before and after intervention in the thoracic spine self-mobilization group. CONCLUSION: Patients with mechanical neck pain who carried out thoracic spine self-mobilization showed increases in active cervical flexion and extension ROM.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.05.008
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31103129
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.05.008
  • PubMed ID : 31103129

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS