Background: Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) provides a unique opportunity for in vivo measurements of the brain's metabolic profile. Two methods of mainstream data acquisition are compared at 7 T, which provides certain advantages as well as challenges. The two representative methods have seldom been compared in terms of measured metabolite concentrations and different scan times. The current study investigated proton MRS of the posterior cingulate cortex using a semi-localized by adiabatic selective refocusing (sLASER) sequence and a short echo time (TE) stimulated echo acquisition mode (sSTEAM) sequence, and it compared their reliability and repeatability at 7 T using a 32-channel head coil. Methods: Sixteen healthy subjects were prospectively enrolled and scanned twice with an off-bed interval between scans. The scan parameters for sLASER were a TR/TE of 6.5 s/32 ms and 32 and 48 averages (sLASER×32 and sLASER×48, respectively). The scan parameters for sSTEAM were a TR/TE of 4 s/5 ms and 32, 48, and 64 averages (sSTEAM4×32, sSTEAM4×48, and sSTEAM4×64, respectively) in addition to that with a TR/TE of 8 s/5 ms and 32 averages (sSTEAM8×32). Data were analyzed using LCModel. Metabolites quantified with Cramér-Rao lower bounds (CRLBs) >50% were classified as not detected, and metabolites quantified with mean or median CRLBs ≤20% were included for further analysis. The SNR, CRLBs, coefficient of variation (CV), and metabolite concentrations were statistically compared using the Shapiro-Wilk test, one-way ANOVA, or the Friedman test. Results: The sLASER spectra for N-acetylaspartate + N-acetylaspartylglutamate (tNAA) and glutamate (Glu) had a comparable or higher SNR than sSTEAM spectra. Ten metabolites had lower CRLBs than prefixed thresholds: aspartate (Asp), γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), glutamine (Gln), Glu, glutathione (GSH), myo-inositol (Ins), taurine (Tau), the total amount of phosphocholine + glycerophosphocholine (tCho), creatine + phosphocreatine (tCr), and tNAA. Performance of the two sequences was satisfactory except for GABA, for which sLASER yielded higher CRLBs (≥18%) than sSTEAM. Some significant differences in CRLBs were noted, but they were ≤2% except for GABA and Gln. Signal averaging significantly lowered CRLBs for some metabolites but only by a small amount. Measurement repeatability as indicated by median CVs was ≤10% for Gln, Glu, Ins, tCho, tCr, and tNAA in all scans, and that for Asp, GABA, GSH, and Tau was ≥10% under some scanning conditions. The CV for GABA according to sLASER was significantly higher than that according to sSTEAM, whereas the CV for Ins was higher according to sSTEAM. An increase in signal averaging contribute little to lower CVs except for Ins. Conclusions: Both sequences quantified brain metabolites with a high degree of precision and repeatability. They are comparable except for GABA, for which sSTEAM would be a better choice.