論文

査読有り
2012年2月

Which classical correspondence is valid in intuitionistic modal logic?

LOGIC JOURNAL OF THE IGPL
  • Kensuke Kojima

20
1
開始ページ
331
終了ページ
348
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1093/jigpal/jzr044
出版者・発行元
OXFORD UNIV PRESS

Modal logics reason about properties of relational structures, and such properties are often characterized by axioms of modal logics. This connection between properties of relational structures and axioms of modal logics are called correspondence, and has been investigated well in the classical setting. The problem we consider is an intuitionistic version of this correspondence. In particular, this paper considers which part of the correspondence results known in classical setting is true for intuitionistic one. We first define the notion of robustness of axioms so that an axiom is robust if and only if its corresponding properties in classical and intuitionistic semantics are the same. Next we give a syntactically defined class of axioms, and prove that all axioms in this class are robust. This result is an analogue of the classical result by Sahlqvist, and its proof is partly based on a known proof of his theorem.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzr044
Web of Science
https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=JSTA_CEL&SrcApp=J_Gate_JST&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=WOS:000299350900017&DestApp=WOS_CPL
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1093/jigpal/jzr044
  • ISSN : 1367-0751
  • Web of Science ID : WOS:000299350900017

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS