論文

査読有り 本文へのリンクあり
2020年2月

Dosimetric verification of IMPT using a commercial heterogeneous phantom

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
  • Keisuke Yasui
  • ,
  • Toshiyuki Toshito
  • ,
  • Chihiro Omachi
  • ,
  • Kensuke Hayashi
  • ,
  • Hideto Kinou
  • ,
  • Masaki Katsurada
  • ,
  • Naoki Hayashi
  • ,
  • Hiroyuki Ogino

20
2
開始ページ
114
終了ページ
120
記述言語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1002/acm2.12535

© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine The purpose of this study was to propose a verification method and results of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), using a commercially available heterogeneous phantom. We used a simple simulated head and neck and prostate phantom. An ionization chamber and radiochromic film were used for measurements of absolute dose and relative dose distribution. The measured doses were compared with calculated doses using a treatment planning system. We defined the uncertainty of the measurement point of the ionization chamber due to the effective point of the chamber and mechanical setup error as 2 mm and estimated the dose variation base on a 2 mm error. We prepared a HU-relative stopping power conversion table and fluence correction factor that were specific to the heterogeneous phantom. The fluence correction factor was determined as a function of depth and was obtained from the ratio of the doses in water and in the phantom at the same effective depths. In the simulated prostate plan, composite doses of measurements and calculations agreed within ±1.3% and the maximum local dose differences of each field were 10.0%. Composite doses in the simulated head and neck plan agreed within 4.0% and the maximum local dose difference for each field was 12.0%. The dose difference for each field came within 2% when taking the measurement uncertainty into consideration. In the composite plan, the maximum dose uncertainty was estimated as 4.0% in the simulated prostate plan and 5.8% in the simulated head and neck plan. Film measurements showed good agreement, with more than 92.5% of points passing a gamma value (3%/3 mm). From these results, the heterogeneous phantom should be useful for verification of IMPT by using a phantom-specific HU-relative stopping power conversion, fluence correction factor, and dose error estimation due to the effective point of the chamber.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12535
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30673145
Scopus
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061350826&origin=inward 本文へのリンクあり
Scopus Citedby
https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061350826&origin=inward
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1002/acm2.12535
  • eISSN : 1526-9914
  • PubMed ID : 30673145
  • SCOPUS ID : 85061350826

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS