Papers

International journal
Jan 28, 2020

Bone microarchitectural analysis using ultra-high-resolution CT in tiger vertebra and human tibia.

European radiology experimental
  • Ryota Inai
  • Ryuichi Nakahara
  • Yusuke Morimitsu
  • Noriaki Akagi
  • Youhei Marukawa
  • Toshi Matsushita
  • Takashi Tanaka
  • Akihiro Tada
  • Takao Hiraki
  • Yoshihisa Nasu
  • Keiichiro Nishida
  • Toshifumi Ozaki
  • Susumu Kanazawa
  • Display all

Volume
4
Number
1
First page
4
Last page
4
Language
English
Publishing type
Research paper (scientific journal)
DOI
10.1186/s41747-019-0135-0

BACKGROUND: To reveal trends in bone microarchitectural parameters with increasing spatial resolution on ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (UHRCT) in vivo and to compare its performance with that of conventional-resolution CT (CRCT) and micro-CT ex vivo. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 5 tiger vertebrae ex vivo and 16 human tibiae in vivo. Seven-pattern and four-pattern resolution imaging were performed on tiger vertebra using CRCT, UHRCT, and micro-CT, and on human tibiae using UHRCT. We measured six microarchitectural parameters: volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), trabecular bone volume fraction (bone volume/total volume, BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), and connectivity density (ConnD). Comparisons between different imaging resolutions were performed using Tukey or Dunnett T3 test. RESULTS: The vBMD, BV/TV, Tb.N, and ConnD parameters showed an increasing trend, while Tb.Sp showed a decreasing trend both ex vivo and in vivo. Ex vivo, UHRCT at the two highest resolutions (1024- and 2048-matrix imaging with 0.25-mm slice thickness) and CRCT showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.047) in vBMD (51.4 mg/cm3 and 63.5 mg/cm3 versus 20.8 mg/cm3), BV/TV (26.5% and 29.5% versus 13.8 %), Tb.N (1.3 l/mm and 1.48 l/mm versus 0.47 l/mm), and ConnD (0.52 l/mm3 and 0.74 l/mm3 versus 0.02 l/mm3, respectively). In vivo, the 512- and 1024-matrix imaging with 0.25-mm slice thickness showed significant differences in Tb.N (0.38 l/mm versus 0.67 l/mm, respectively) and ConnD (0.06 l/mm3 versus 0.22 l/mm3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We observed characteristic trends in microarchitectural parameters and demonstrated the potential utility of applying UHRCT for microarchitectural analysis.

Link information
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-019-0135-0
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993864
PubMed Central
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987291
ID information
  • DOI : 10.1186/s41747-019-0135-0
  • Pubmed ID : 31993864
  • Pubmed Central ID : PMC6987291

Export
BibTeX RIS