2012年7月
Different Effects of AT(1) Receptor Antagonist and ETA Receptor Antagonist on Ischemia-Induced Norepinephrine Release in Rat Hearts
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
- ,
- ,
- ,
- ,
- ,
- ,
- 巻
- 60
- 号
- 1
- 開始ページ
- 55
- 終了ページ
- 60
- 記述言語
- 英語
- 掲載種別
- 研究論文(学術雑誌)
- DOI
- 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31825760b5
- 出版者・発行元
- LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT(1)R) antagonist and endothelin type A receptor (ETAR) antagonist were compared as regards their effects on ischemia-induced exocytotic or carrier-mediated norepinephrine (NE) release from cardiac sympathetic nerve endings. According to the Langendorff technique, isolated rat hearts were subjected to 20-minute or 40-minute global ischemia followed by 30-minute reperfusion. Candesartan (selective AT(1)R antagonist) and ABT-627 (selective ETAR antagonist) were perfused, beginning 15 minutes before ischemia. Candesartan (10 and 100 nM) and ABT-627 (3 mu M) suppressed excessive NE overflow (exocytotic release) in the coronary effluent from the heart exposed to 20-minute ischemia. In addition, these agents improved postischemic cardiac dysfunction. On the other hand, the beneficial effects of ABT-627 (1 and 3 mu M) on NE overflow (carrier-mediated release) and cardiac dysfunction were also observed in 40-minute ischemia, whereas those were not improved by treatment with candesartan (10 and 100 nM and 1 mu M). These findings suggest that both AT(1)R antagonist and ETAR antagonist have ability to inhibit the exocytotic NE release, but the carrier-mediated NE release induced by prolonged ischemia cannot be avoided by AT(1)R antagonist. Thus, ETAR antagonist may be more useful than AT(1)R antagonist in the clinical settings of ischemic heart disease.
- リンク情報
- ID情報
-
- DOI : 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31825760b5
- ISSN : 0160-2446
- Web of Science ID : WOS:000306274000008