論文

査読有り
2014年11月

Tamibarotene As Maintenance Therapy for Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
  • Katsuji Shinagawa
  • Masamitsu Yanada
  • Toru Sakura
  • Yasunori Ueda
  • Masashi Sawa
  • Junichi Miyatake
  • Nobuaki Dobashi
  • Minoru Kojima
  • Yoshihiro Hatta
  • Nobuhiko Emi
  • Shigehisa Tamaki
  • Hiroshi Gomyo
  • Etsuko Yamazaki
  • Katsumichi Fujimaki
  • Norio Asou
  • Keitaro Matsuo
  • Shigeki Ohtake
  • Yasushi Miyazaki
  • Kazunori Ohnishi
  • Yukio Kobayashi
  • Tomoki Naoe
  • 全て表示

32
33
開始ページ
3729
終了ページ
+
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1200/JCO.2013.53.3570
出版者・発行元
AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Purpose
The introduction of all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) has significantly improved outcomes for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), although a subset of patients still suffer relapse. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of maintenance therapy with the synthetic retinoid tamibarotene in APL.
Patients and Methods
Patients with newly diagnosed APL in molecular remission at the end of consolidation therapy were randomly assigned to receive ATRA or tamibarotene, both orally, for 14 days every 3 months for up to 2 years.
Results
A total of 347 patients were enrolled. Of the 344 eligible patients, 319 (93%) achieved complete remission. After completing three courses of consolidation therapy, 269 patients underwent maintenance random assignment. The relapse-free survival (RFS) rate at 4 years was 84% for the ATRA arm and 91% for the tamibarotene arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.13). When the analysis was restricted to 52 high-risk patients with an initial WBC count >= 10.0 x 10(9)/L, the intergroup difference was statistically significant, with 4-year RFS rates of 58% for the ATRA arm and 87% for the tamibarotene arm (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.95). For patients with non-high-risk disease, the HR was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.32 to 2.01). The test for interaction between treatment effects and these subgroups resulted in P = .075. Both treatments were generally well tolerated.
Conclusion
In this trial, no difference was detected between ATRA and tamibarotene for maintenance therapy. In an exploratory analysis, there was a suggestion of improved efficacy of tamibarotene in high-risk patients, but this requires further study. (C) 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.53.3570
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25245439
Web of Science
https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=JSTA_CEL&SrcApp=J_Gate_JST&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=WOS:000344861400008&DestApp=WOS_CPL
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.3570
  • ISSN : 0732-183X
  • eISSN : 1527-7755
  • PubMed ID : 25245439
  • Web of Science ID : WOS:000344861400008

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS