This paper proposes that we need to be back to the initial big questions again to revitalize the science studies. In 1980s, there were many fertile and intrinsic questions in the discussions about the social accounts of scientific practices. But in this decade, many science studies have divided into more discipline-specified small questions. The departmentalized and single-filed elaboration abates the chaotic but imaginative inquiring mind. In this paper, I emphasize the necessity of intrinsic philosophical discussions like in the initial debates. This paper focuses on the reexamination of the eliminability of "the social" factor, which is a critical issue in the science studies, mainly through the Bloor-Laudan debates.