Background: The purposes of this study were to quantitatively analyze osteophyte formation of the distal radius following scaphoid nonunion and to investigate how fracture locations relate to osteophyte formation patterns.
Methods: Three-dimensional surface models of the scaphoid and distal radius were constructed from computed tomographic images of both the wrists of 17 patients' with scaphoid nonunion. The scaphoid nonunions were classified into 3 types according to the location of the fracture line: distal extra-articular (n = 6); distal intra-articular (n = 5); and proximal (n = 6). The osteophyte models of the radius were created by subtracting the mirror image of the contralateral radius model from the affected radius model using a Boolean operation. The osteophyte locations on the radius were divided into 5 areas: styloid process, dorsal scaphoid fossa, volar scaphoid fossa, dorsal lunate fossa, and volar lunate fossa. Osteophyte volumes were compared among the areas and types of nonunion. The presence or absence of dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI) deformity was also determined.
Results: The distal intra-articular type exhibited significantly larger osteophytes in the styloid process than the distal extra-articular type. Furthermore, the proximal type exhibited significantly larger osteophytes in the dorsal scaphoid fossa than the distal extra-articular type. Finally, the distal intra- and extra-articular types were more associated with DISI deformity and tended to have larger osteophytes in the lunate fossa than the proximal type.
Conclusion: The pattern of osteophyte formation in the distal radius determined using three-dimensional computed tomography imaging varied among the different types of scaphoid nonunion (distal extra articular, distal intra-articular, and proximal). The results of this study are clinically useful in determining whether additional resection of osteophytes or radial styloid is necessary or not during the treatment of the scaphoid nonunion. (C) 2016 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.