論文

査読有り 責任著者
2019年4月

Comparison of Pegfilgrastim and Filgrastim for the Primary Prophylactic Effect for Preventing Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Undergoing Rituximab with Dose-adjusted EPOCH Chemotherapy

YAKUGAKU ZASSHI-JOURNAL OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
  • Kataoka, Tatsuo
  • ,
  • Sakurashita, Hiroshi
  • ,
  • Taogoshi, Takanori
  • ,
  • Nishigakiuchi, Ryo
  • ,
  • Murase, Tetsuya
  • ,
  • Izumitani, Satoru
  • ,
  • Saeki, Yasuyuki
  • ,
  • Matsuo, Hiroaki

139
4
開始ページ
629
終了ページ
633
記述言語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1248/yakushi.18-00101
出版者・発行元
PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN

The combination of dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin with rituximab (DA-EPOCH-R) is used for non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common complication of treatment with myelo-suppressive chemotherapy, so preventing FN is important for maintaining chemotherapy dosage. Recently, pegfilgrastim has been used as the primary prophylaxis of FN in Japan, but there have been few cases reported using pegfilgrastim for the primary prophylaxis in DA-EPOCH-R. In this study, we retrospectively compared the efficacy of pegfilgrastim with that of filgrastim in patients receiving DA-EPOCH-R in Hiroshima University Hospital. Efficacy assessment was based on incidence of FN and serious neutropenia (neutrophil count < 500/mu L), hospitalization days and chemotherapy dosage level. Ten patients met the inclusion criteria: pegfilgrastim (n = 5, 30 cycles) or filgrastim (n = 5, 16 cycles). No difference in efficacy existed between pegfilgrastim and filgrastim in the first cycle; however, 2 of 5 patients in filgrastim group reduced dose level in the total cycles of chemotherapy, no patients in pegfilgrastim group reduced. In conclusion

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.18-00101
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1248/yakushi.18-00101
  • ISSN : 0031-6903

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS