論文

国際誌
2021年10月

Monoclonal antibody and anti-cytokine biologics for Kawasaki disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism
  • Osamu Nomura
  • ,
  • Sayaka Fukuda
  • ,
  • Erika Ota
  • ,
  • Hiroshi Ono
  • ,
  • Akira Ishiguro
  • ,
  • Tohru Kobayashi

51
5
開始ページ
1045
終了ページ
1056
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.07.020

BACKGROUND: Kawasaki disease (KD) is a form of self-limiting vasculitis that causes coronary artery abnormalities in children. Although clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies and anti-cytokine biologics that block cytokine cascades have been conducted, the studies have revealed contradictory results. To examine the effectiveness of treatment with monoclonal antibodies and anti-cytokine biologics for KD patients, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (e.g., cohort studies, case-control studies, case-series, and case-reports) were included to summarize available evidence, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ICUSHI were used for systematic research. Meta-analysis of the included studies was conducted using fixed-effect or random-effects models, depending on the degree of between-study heterogeneity. We assessed coronary artery and treatment outcomes of the interventions. The certainty of evidence and risk of bias were assessed using the GRADE and Cochrane risk of bias tool. The protocol of this review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016033079). RESULTS: Results: Of all searched studies, 183 studies were qualitatively analyzed. We finally included four randomized controlled trials with 456 patients in quantitative syntheses. Monoclonal antibodies and anti-cytokine biologics did not reduce the frequency of CAA (risk ratio [RR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 0.65 to 1.32, low certainty of evidence), compared with the conventional treatment with IVIG. However, the frequency of treatment resistance (RR, 0.60; 95%CI, 0.38 to 0.95, moderate certainty of evidence) was reduced by the antibodies. We found no statistical differences in either "any adverse event" (RR, 0.92; 95%CI, 0.80 to 1.06, low certainty of evidence) or "adverse events attributable to the administration of the medication" (RR, 1.10; 95%CI, 0.72 to 1.69, low certainty of evidence) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Although monoclonal antibodies and anti-cytokine biologics were not effective in reducing the frequency of CAA in KD patients, the frequency of treatment resistance might be reduced by those agents compared with conventional IVIG therapy alone.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.07.020
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34416626
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.07.020
  • PubMed ID : 34416626

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS