2009年
KINETICS OF CO(2) REFORMING OF METHANE BY CATALYTICALLY ACTIVATED METALLIC FOAM ABSORBER FOR SOLAR RECEIVER-REACTORS
ES2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY, VOL 2
- ,
- ,
- ,
- ,
- 巻
- 34
- 号
- 4
- 開始ページ
- 371
- 終了ページ
- 383
- 記述言語
- 英語
- 掲載種別
- 研究論文(国際会議プロシーディングス)
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.12.018
- 出版者・発行元
- AMER SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
Ni-Cr-Al alloy foam absorber with high porosity was catalytically activated using a Ru/gamma-Al(2)O(3) catalyst, and was subsequently tested with respect to CO(2) reforming of methane in a small-scale volumetric receiver-reactor by using a sun simulator. A chemical storage efficiency of about 40% was obtained for a mean light flux of 325 kW m(-2). Furthermore, the activity and the stability of the metallic foam absorber were compared with those of a SiC foam absorber activated with the same Ru/gamma-Al(2)O(3) catalyst for 50 h of light irradiation, and it was found that the metallic foam absorber has superior catalytic stability in comparison to the SiC form absorber. In addition, unlike ceramic foams such as SiC, metallic foams feature superior plasticity, which prevents the emergence of cracks caused by mechanical or thermal shock.
The kinetics of CO(2) reforming of methane over metallic foam absorbers were also examined for temperatures of 600-750 degrees C using a quartz tube reactor and an electric furnace. The experiments were performed by varying the methane/CO(2) ratios of 0.5-2.3. Moreover, the kinetic data were fitted to four different types of kinetic models, namely the Langmuir-Hinshelwood, Basic, Eley-Rideal, and Stepwise mechanisms. The kinetic model which provided the best prediction of the experimental reforming rates was the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism.
The kinetics of CO(2) reforming of methane over metallic foam absorbers were also examined for temperatures of 600-750 degrees C using a quartz tube reactor and an electric furnace. The experiments were performed by varying the methane/CO(2) ratios of 0.5-2.3. Moreover, the kinetic data were fitted to four different types of kinetic models, namely the Langmuir-Hinshelwood, Basic, Eley-Rideal, and Stepwise mechanisms. The kinetic model which provided the best prediction of the experimental reforming rates was the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism.
- リンク情報
- ID情報
-
- DOI : 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.12.018
- Web of Science ID : WOS:000265479400040