Papers

Peer-reviewed Open access International journal
2017

Estimation of lifetime cumulative incidence and mortality risk of gastric cancer

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Yukari Taniyama
  • ,
  • Kota Katanoda
  • ,
  • Hadrien Charvat
  • ,
  • Megumi Hori
  • ,
  • Yuko Ohno
  • ,
  • Shizuka Sasazuki
  • ,
  • Shoichiro Tsugane

Volume
47
Number
11
First page
1097
Last page
1102
Language
English
Publishing type
Research paper (scientific journal)
DOI
10.1093/jjco/hyx128
Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS

© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. Objective: To estimate cumulative incidence and mortality risk for gastric cancer by risk category. Methods: Risk was classified into four types according to the presence/absence of Helicobacter pylori infection and chronic atrophic gastritis: in order of lowest to highest risk, Group A: H. pylori (-) and atrophic gastritis(-); Group B: H. pylori(+) and atrophic gastritis(-); Group C:H. pylori(+) and atrophic gastritis(+); and, Group D: H. pylori(-) and atrophic gastritis(+). We used vital statistics for the crude all-cause and crude gastric cancer mortality rates in 2011 and data from population-based cancer registries (the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan) for gastric cancer incidence in 2011. For relative risk and prevalence, we used the results of a meta-analysis integrating previous studies and data from the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study for the Next Generation, respectively (baseline survey 2011-16). We calculated the crude incidence and mortality rates and estimated the cumulative risk using a life-table method. Results: The estimated lifetime cumulative incidence risk was 11.4% for men and 5.7% for women. The estimated risk for Groups A, B, C and D was 2.4%, 10.8%, 26.7% and 35.5% for men, and 1.2%, 5.5%, 13.5% and 18.0% for women, respectively. Similarly, the estimated lifetime cumulative mortality risk was 3.9% for men and 1.8% for women. The estimated risk of mortality for Groups A, B, C and D was 0.8%, 3.6%, 9.0% and 12.0% for men, and 0.4%, 1.7%, 4.2% and 5.7% for women, respectively. Conclusions: Our results may be useful for designing individually tailored prevention programs.

Link information
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyx128
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28977484
PubMed Central
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896697
Web of Science
https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=JSTA_CEL&SrcApp=J_Gate_JST&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=WOS:000414362800016&DestApp=WOS_CPL
Scopus
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85034026429&origin=inward Open access
Scopus Citedby
https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85034026429&origin=inward
URL
http://academic.oup.com/jjco/article-pdf/47/11/1097/24356835/hyx128.pdf
ID information
  • DOI : 10.1093/jjco/hyx128
  • ISSN : 0368-2811
  • eISSN : 1465-3621
  • Pubmed ID : 28977484
  • Pubmed Central ID : PMC5896697
  • SCOPUS ID : 85034026429
  • Web of Science ID : WOS:000414362800016

Export
BibTeX RIS