論文

査読有り 国際誌
2019年

Monitoring of muscle mass in critically ill patients: comparison of ultrasound and two bioelectrical impedance analysis devices.

Journal of intensive care
  • Nobuto Nakanishi
  • ,
  • Rie Tsutsumi
  • ,
  • Yoshihiro Okayama
  • ,
  • Takuya Takashima
  • ,
  • Yoshitoyo Ueno
  • ,
  • Taiga Itagaki
  • ,
  • Yasuo Tsutsumi
  • ,
  • Hiroshi Sakaue
  • ,
  • Jun Oto

7
開始ページ
61
終了ページ
61
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1186/s40560-019-0416-y

Background: Skeletal muscle atrophy commonly occurs in critically ill patients, and decreased muscle mass is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Muscle mass can be assessed using various tools, including ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). However, the effectiveness of muscle mass monitoring is unclear in critically ill patients. This study was conducted to compare ultrasound and BIA for the monitoring of muscle mass in critically ill patients. Methods: We recruited adult patients who were expected to undergo mechanical ventilation for > 48 h and to remain in the intensive care unit (ICU) for > 5 days. On days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10, muscle mass was evaluated using an ultrasound and two BIA devices (Bioscan: Malton International, England; Physion: Nippon Shooter, Japan). The influence of fluid balance was also evaluated between each measurement day. Results: We analyzed 93 images in 21 patients. The age of the patients was 69 (interquartile range, IQR, 59-74) years, with 16 men and 5 women. The length of ICU stay was 11 days (IQR, 9-25 days). The muscle mass, monitored by ultrasound, decreased progressively by 9.2% (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.9-12.5%), 12.7% (95% CI, 9.3-16.1%), 18.2% (95% CI, 14.7-21.6%), and 21.8% (95% CI, 17.9-25.7%) on days 3, 5, 7, and 10 (p <  0.01), respectively, with no influence of fluid balance (r = 0.04, p = 0.74). The muscle mass did not decrease significantly in both the BIA devices (Bioscan, p = 0.14; Physion, p = 0.60), and an influence of fluid balance was observed (Bioscan, r = 0.37, p <  0.01; Physion, r = 0.51, p <  0.01). The muscle mass assessment at one point between ultrasound and BIA was moderately correlated (Bioscan, r = 0.51, p <  0.01; Physion, r = 0.37, p <  0.01), but the change of muscle mass in the same patient did not correlate between these two devices (Bioscan, r = - 0.05, p = 0.69; Physion, r = 0.23, p = 0.07). Conclusions: Ultrasound is suitable for sequential monitoring of muscle atrophy in critically ill patients. Monitoring by BIA should be carefully interpreted owing to the influence of fluid change. Trial registration: UMIN000031316. Retrospectively registered on 15 February 2018.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-019-0416-y
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890223
PubMed Central
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6916000
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1186/s40560-019-0416-y
  • PubMed ID : 31890223
  • PubMed Central 記事ID : PMC6916000

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS