論文

査読有り 筆頭著者 責任著者 国際誌
2020年7月

Quantitative Evaluation of Functional Instability Due to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
  • Takayuki Matsuo
  • ,
  • Maki Koyanagi
  • ,
  • Ryo Okimoto
  • ,
  • Toshitaka Moriuchi
  • ,
  • Koji Ikeda
  • ,
  • Naruhiko Nakae
  • ,
  • Shigeto Nakagawa
  • ,
  • Konsei Shino

8
7
開始ページ
2325967120933885
終了ページ
2325967120933885
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1177/2325967120933885

Background: A safe and simple procedure to evaluate functional instability due to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency (ACLD) has not been established. The angle of trunk backward tilting, which is known as a posture at risk for ACL injuries, could be used as a parameter to evaluate functional instability due to ACLD. Purpose: To measure the backward tilt angle of the trunk with participants standing upright on 1 leg and to investigate its usefulness to quantitatively evaluate functional instability due to ACLD. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Our cohort included 50 participants with unilateral ACLD and 40 participants with bilateral healthy knees. The trunk backward tilt (TBT) test was conducted as follows: the participant was asked to maximally tilt the trunk backward in a single-leg standing position, while forward tilt of the index leg was blocked with a custom-made device. The TBT angle was measured using a side-view photograph. Subjective knee instability during the test was recorded using a visual analog scale (VAS). The relative and absolute reliability of the TBT test were verified in a sample of healthy participants and those with ACLD, and comparisons between indicators were performed. Multiple regression analysis was performed with the injured/uninjured side ratio (I/U ratio) of the TBT angle as the dependent variable and the following independent variables: (1) I/U ratio of knee extension muscle strength, (2) I/U ratio of knee flexion muscle strength, (3) side-to-side difference (SSD) of the KT-1000 arthrometer measurement, (4) sex, and (5) SSD of the VAS score. Results: The TBT test had high reliability among healthy participants and those with ACLD. The TBT angle was significantly smaller and the VAS score was significantly higher on the injured side compared with the uninjured side and with healthy knees (P < .001 for all). Among the independent variables, the SSD of the VAS score had a negative influence on the I/U ratio of the TBT angle (R2 = 0.59; P < .001). Conclusion: The TBT test is a simple, safe, and reliable method for quantitatively evaluating functional instability due to ACLD under weightbearing conditions that reflect subjective knee instability. The test will provide an index of treatment outcomes and return to sports through additional objective measurements before and after ACL reconstruction.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120933885
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32733975
PubMed Central
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7370573
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1177/2325967120933885
  • PubMed ID : 32733975
  • PubMed Central 記事ID : PMC7370573

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS