2015年12月
Unrelated bone marrow transplantation or immediate umbilical cord blood transplantation for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
- 巻
- 97
- 号
- 3
- 開始ページ
- 278
- 終了ページ
- 287
- 記述言語
- 英語
- 掲載種別
- 研究論文(学術雑誌)
- DOI
- 10.1111/ejh.12723
- 出版者・発行元
- WILEY-BLACKWELL
BackgroundWhile unrelated bone marrow transplantation (UBMT) has been widely used as alternative donor transplantation, the use of umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) is increasing recently.
MethodsWe conducted a decision analysis to address which transplantation procedure should be prioritized for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring high- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics in first complete remission (CR1), when they lack a matched related donor but have immediate access to a suitable umbilical cord blood unit. Main sources for our analysis comprised the data from three phase III trials for a chemotherapy cohort (n = 907) and the registry data for a transplantation cohort (n = 752).
ResultsThe baseline analysis showed that when the 8/8 match was considered for UBMT, the expected 5-year survival rate was higher for UBMT than for UCBT (58.1% vs. 51.8%). This ranking did not change even when the 7/8 match was considered for UBMT. Sensitivity analysis showed consistent superiority of UBMT over UCBT when the time elapsed between CR1 and UBMT was varied within a plausible range of 3-9 months.
ConclusionsThese results suggest that 8/8 or 7/8 UBMT is a better transplantation option than UCBT even after allowing time required for donor coordination.
MethodsWe conducted a decision analysis to address which transplantation procedure should be prioritized for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring high- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics in first complete remission (CR1), when they lack a matched related donor but have immediate access to a suitable umbilical cord blood unit. Main sources for our analysis comprised the data from three phase III trials for a chemotherapy cohort (n = 907) and the registry data for a transplantation cohort (n = 752).
ResultsThe baseline analysis showed that when the 8/8 match was considered for UBMT, the expected 5-year survival rate was higher for UBMT than for UCBT (58.1% vs. 51.8%). This ranking did not change even when the 7/8 match was considered for UBMT. Sensitivity analysis showed consistent superiority of UBMT over UCBT when the time elapsed between CR1 and UBMT was varied within a plausible range of 3-9 months.
ConclusionsThese results suggest that 8/8 or 7/8 UBMT is a better transplantation option than UCBT even after allowing time required for donor coordination.
- リンク情報
-
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.12723
- J-GLOBAL
- https://jglobal.jst.go.jp/detail?JGLOBAL_ID=201702205065261206
- PubMed
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26680003
- Web of Science
- https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=JSTA_CEL&SrcApp=J_Gate_JST&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=WOS:000383470200012&DestApp=WOS_CPL
- URL
- http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/26680003
- ID情報
-
- DOI : 10.1111/ejh.12723
- ISSN : 0902-4441
- eISSN : 1600-0609
- J-Global ID : 201702205065261206
- ORCIDのPut Code : 24261704
- PubMed ID : 26680003
- Web of Science ID : WOS:000383470200012