論文

査読有り
2011年

Correlation of antinuclear antibody and anti-double-stranded DNA antibody with clinical response to infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective clinical study

ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY
  • Naoichiro Yukawa
  • ,
  • Takao Fujii
  • ,
  • Seiko Kondo-Ishikawa
  • ,
  • Hajime Yoshifuji
  • ,
  • Daisuke Kawabata
  • ,
  • Takaki Nojima
  • ,
  • Koichiro Ohmura
  • ,
  • Takashi Usui
  • ,
  • Tsuneyo Mimori

13
6
開始ページ
R213
終了ページ
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1186/ar3546
出版者・発行元
BIOMED CENTRAL LTD

Introduction: The induction of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) or anti-double-stranded (ds) -DNA antibodies (Abs) after infliximab (IFX) therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a well-known phenomenon, but the correlation of such Abs with the clinical response to IFX has not yet been determined. The aims of this retrospective observational study were to examine the prevalence of positive ANA and anti-ds-DNA Abs before and after IFX therapy in patients with RA and to investigate whether an increased titer of such Abs is associated with the clinical efficacy of IFX.
Methods: One hundred eleven RA patients who had received IFX were studied. ANA (indirect immunofluorescence with HEp-2 cells) and anti-ds-DNA Abs (Farr assay) results were examined before and after IFX therapy.
Results: The overall clinical response assessed by EULAR response criteria was as follows: good response in 55%, including remission in 38%; moderate response in 18%; and no response (NOR) in 27%. The positivity of ANA (>= 1:160) and anti-ds-DNA Abs significantly increased from 25% to 40% (P = 0.03) and from 3% to 26% (P < 0.001) after IFX, respectively. EULAR response differed significantly according to the ANA titer before IFX (P = 0.001), and the efficacy of IFX became worse as the ANA titer before starting IFX increased. Furthermore, the differences in the clinical response of the ANA titer before IFX <= 1:80 and >= 1:160 were significant (good, moderate, and no response were 66%, 9%, and 25% in <= 1:80 group versus 26%, 33%, 41% in >= 1:160 group, respectively; P < 0.001). In 13 patients whose ANA had increased after IFX, 10 showed NOR, only one showed a good response, and none reached remission. These clinical responses were significantly different from ANA no-change patients. In 21 patients with positive anti-ds-DNA Abs after IFX, 16 showed NOR, only two showed a good response, and none reached remission.
Conclusions: The present study suggests that the ANA titer before starting IFX predicts the clinical response to IFX. The increased titers of ANA or anti-ds-DNA Abs after IFX may be useful markers of NOR.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/ar3546
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22192852
Web of Science
https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=JSTA_CEL&SrcApp=J_Gate_JST&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=WOS:000301175700033&DestApp=WOS_CPL
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1186/ar3546
  • ISSN : 1478-6354
  • eISSN : 1478-6362
  • PubMed ID : 22192852
  • Web of Science ID : WOS:000301175700033

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS