論文

査読有り
2013年10月

Assessment of antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent perioperative infection in patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy: multicenter cohort study

JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY
  • Rikiya Taoka
  • Yoshikazu Togo
  • Tatsuhiko Kubo
  • Masahito Kido
  • Kenta Miki
  • Hiroshi Kiyota
  • Shin Egawa
  • Takashi Sugawara
  • Mitsuru Yasuda
  • Masahiro Nakano
  • Takashi Deguchi
  • Masashi Nishino
  • Kiyohito Ishikawa
  • Ryoichi Shiroki
  • Minori Matsumoto
  • Katsumi Shigemura
  • Kazushi Tanaka
  • Soichi Arakawa
  • Masato Fujisawa
  • Koichiro Wada
  • Toyohiko Watanabe
  • Hiromi Kumon
  • Kanao Kobayashi
  • Akio Matsubara
  • Takehiko Sho
  • Ryoichi Hamasuna
  • Tetsuro Matsumoto
  • Hiroshi Hayami
  • Masayuki Nakagawa
  • Shingo Yamamoto
  • 全て表示

19
5
開始ページ
926
終了ページ
930
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1007/s10156-013-0610-0
出版者・発行元
SPRINGER JAPAN KK

To propose an appropriate prophylactic antimicrobial therapy for patients undergoing brachytherapy, we evaluated the relationships between various antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) protocols and the incidence of postimplant infections in a multicenter cohort study conducted in Japan. The records of 826 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent a transperineal I-125 brachytherapy procedure between January 2009 and December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative infections, including surgical site and remote infections, were recorded up to postoperative day 30. A total of 6 (0.73 %) patients had a perioperative infection following seed implantation, of whom all received AMP for 1 or more days. None of the patients who received a single-dose protocol of AMP using fluoroquinolone p.o. or penicillin with a beta-lactamase inhibitor i.v. developed a perioperative infection. Statistical analysis showed that a single-dose protocol was more significantly related to a lower risk of perioperative infection as compared to the other AMP protocols examined (p = 0.045). Furthermore, our results indicated that bacteriuria and preoperative hair removal were risk factors of perioperative infection with statistical significance (p = 0.007, p = 0.004). Analysis of patient clinical parameters, including age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, diabetes mellitus, prostate volume, numbers of implanted seeds and needle punctures, operation time, and indwelling duration time of the Foley catheter, did not reveal significant differences in terms of perioperative infection. Our results indicated that a single-dose AMP protocol is sufficient to prevent perioperative infections following seed implantation. On the other hand, AMP is only one of several measures to prevent perioperative infectious complications. It is necessary to know that the patient must have no bacteriuria and that preoperative hair removal should be avoided.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-013-0610-0
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23645185
Web of Science
https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=JSTA_CEL&SrcApp=J_Gate_JST&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=WOS:000325623900022&DestApp=WOS_CPL
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1007/s10156-013-0610-0
  • ISSN : 1341-321X
  • eISSN : 1437-7780
  • PubMed ID : 23645185
  • Web of Science ID : WOS:000325623900022

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS