MISC

2009年1月

Patterns of Care for Radiotherapy in Vulvar Cancer: A Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Study

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER
  • David K. Gaffney
  • Andreas Du Bois
  • Kailash Narayan
  • Nick Reed
  • Takafumi Toita
  • Sandro Pignata
  • Peter Blake
  • Lorraine Portelance
  • Azmat Sadoyze
  • Richard Potter
  • Alessandro Colombo
  • Marcus Randall
  • Mansoor R. Mirza
  • Edward L. Trimble
  • 全て表示

19
1
開始ページ
163
終了ページ
167
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
DOI
10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181996ac3
出版者・発行元
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS

Background: This study aimed to describe radiotherapeutic practice in the treatment of vulvar cancer in member study groups of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG).
Methods: A Survey was developed and distributed to representatives of the member Study groups of the GCIG, targeting the use of radiotherapy (RT) in vulvar cancer.
Results: Thirty-two surveys were returned from 12 different cooperative groups. The most common indications for neoadjuvant RT include unresectable disease or International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage >= III. For the neoadjuvant treatment of vulvar cancer, pelvic doses were 48.2 +/- 5.0 Gy (mean +/- SD). Tire tipper border of the pelvic field was L4/5 in 4, L5/S1 in 12, and not specified in 4. Of 21 groups that perform neoadjuvant RT, 17 use concomitant chemotherapy and 4 individualize treatment, Weekly cisplatin was the most commonly used chemotherapy. For the neoadjuvant RT treatment of the inguinal region, doses were 49.9 +/- 5.5 Gy (mean SD). Sixteen of 18 groups used Computed tomographic Simulation for planning. After initial surgery, the most common indications for RT included positive lymph nodes or positive margins. Chemotherapy was not routinely used after surgery.
Conclusions: Doses of RT among GCIG members are similar; however, the indications for treatment, treatment fields, and use of chemotherapy differ somewhat between groups. This is likely due to the rarity of the disease. The lack of randomized trials may contribute to the absence of a broadly accepted standard. This underscores the importance of international cooperation as in GCIG to gather more reliable data for uncommon tumors in gynecologic oncology.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181996ac3
Web of Science
https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=JSTA_CEL&SrcApp=J_Gate_JST&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=WOS:000266976100029&DestApp=WOS_CPL
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181996ac3
  • ISSN : 1048-891X
  • Web of Science ID : WOS:000266976100029

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS