論文

査読有り 責任著者
2016年4月16日

Assessing potential countermeasures against the dengue epidemic in non-tropical urban cities

Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
  • Hiroki Masui
  • ,
  • Itsuki Kakitani
  • ,
  • Shumpei Ujiyama
  • ,
  • Kazuyoshi Hashidate
  • ,
  • Masataka Shiono
  • ,
  • Kazue Kudo

13
1
開始ページ
12
終了ページ
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1186/s12976-016-0039-0
出版者・発行元
Springer Nature

Background: Dengue is a common mosquito-borne viral disease epidemic especially in tropical and sub-tropical regions where water sanitation is not substantially controlled. However, dengue epidemics sometimes occur in non-tropical urban cities with substantial water sanitary control. Using a mathematical model, we investigate what conditions can be important for a dengue epidemic to occur in an urban city such as Tokyo, where vectors are active only in summer and there are little number of vectors around hosts.
Methods: The model, which is a modified Ross-Macdonald model, consists of two sets of host-vector compartments. The two sets correspond to high-risk and low-risk areas, and only hosts can move between them. Assuming that mosquitoes have constant activity for only 90 days, we assess five potential countermeasures: (1) restricted movement between the two areas, (2) insecticide application, (3) use of repellents, (4) vector control, and (5) isolation of the infected.
Results: The basic reproduction number R-0 and the cumulative number of infected hosts for 90 days are evaluated for each of the five countermeasures. In the cases of Measures 2-5, the cumulative number of the infected for 90 days can be reduced substantially for small R-0 even if R-0 > 1. Although R0 for Measure 1 monotonically decreases with the mobility rates, the cumulative number of the infected for 90 days has a maximum at a moderate mobility rate. If the mobility rate is sufficiently small, the restricted movement effectively increases the number density of vectors in the high-risk area, and the epidemic starts earlier in the high-risk area than in the low-risk one, while the growth of infections is slow.
Conclusions: Measures 2-5 are more or less effective. However, Measure 1 can have the opposite effect, depending on the mobility rates. The restricted movement results in the formation of a kind of core population, which can promote the epidemic in the entire population.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12976-016-0039-0
Web of Science
https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=JSTA_CEL&SrcApp=J_Gate_JST&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=WOS:000374647200001&DestApp=WOS_CPL
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1186/s12976-016-0039-0
  • ISSN : 1742-4682
  • ORCIDのPut Code : 44957035
  • Web of Science ID : WOS:000374647200001

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS