論文

査読有り
2017年9月

Sandstone provenance and U-Pb ages of detrital zircons from Permian-Triassic forearc sediments within the Sukhothai Arc, northern Thailand: Record of volcanic-arc evolution in response to Paleo-Tethys subduction

JOURNAL OF ASIAN EARTH SCIENCES
  • Hidetoshi Hara
  • Miyuki Kunii
  • Yoshihiro Miyake
  • Ken-ichiro Hisada
  • Yoshihito Kamata
  • Katsumi Ueno
  • Yoshiaki Kon
  • Toshiyuki Kurihara
  • Hayato Ueda
  • San Assavapatchara
  • Anuwat Treerotchananon
  • Thasinee Charoentitirat
  • Punya Charusiri
  • 全て表示

146
開始ページ
30
終了ページ
55
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.04.021
出版者・発行元
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD

Provenance analysis and U-Pb dating of detrital zircons in Permian-Triassic forearc sediments from the Sulchothai Arc in northern Thailand clarify the evolution of a missing arc system associated with Paleo-Tethys subduction. The turbidite-dominant formations within the forearc sediments include the Permian Ngao Group (Kiu Lom, Pha Huat, and Huai Thak formations), the Early to earliest Late Triassic Lampang Group (Phra That and Hong Hoi formations), and the Late Triassic Song Group (Pha Daeng and Wang Chin formations). The sandstones are quartzose in the Pha Huat, Huai Thak, and Wang Chin formations, and lithic wacke in the Kiu Lom, Phra That, Hong Hoi and Pha Daeng formations. The quartzose sandstones contain abundant quartz, felsic volcanic and plutonic fragments, whereas the lithic sandstones contain mainly basaltic to felsic volcanic fragments. The youngest single-grain (YSG) zircon U-Pb age generally approximates the depositional age in the study area, but in the case of the limestone-dominant Pha Huat Formation the YSG age is clearly older. On the other hand, the youngest cluster U-Pb age (YC1 sigma) represents the peak of igneous activity in the source area. Geological evidence, geochemical signatures, and the YC1 sigma ages of the sandstones have allowed us to reconstruct the Sukhothai arc evolution. The initial Sukhothai Arc (Late Carboniferous Early Permian) developed as a continental island arc. Subsequently, there was general magmatic quiescence with minor I-type granitic activity during the Middle to early Late Permian. In the latest Permian to early Late Triassic, the Sukhothai Arc developed in tandem with Early to Middle Triassic I-type granitic activity, Middle to Late Triassic volcanism, evolution of an accretionary complex, and an abundant supply of sediments from the volcanic rocks to the trench through a forearc basin. Subsequently, the Sukhothai Arc became quiescent as the Paleo-Tethys closed after the Late Triassic. In addition, parts of sediments of supposed Devonian Carboniferous age within the Sukhothai Arc were revised as the Triassic Lampang Group, and the Early Cretaceous Khorat Group.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.04.021
Web of Science
https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=JSTA_CEL&SrcApp=J_Gate_JST&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=WOS:000414820300003&DestApp=WOS_CPL
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.04.021
  • ISSN : 1367-9120
  • eISSN : 1878-5786
  • Web of Science ID : WOS:000414820300003

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS