論文

査読有り
2017年11月

The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing

BMC PSYCHIATRY
  • Akiko Kanehara
  • Risa Kotake
  • Yuki Miyamoto
  • Yousuke Kumakura
  • Kentaro Morita
  • Tomoko Ishiura
  • Kimiko Shimizu
  • Yumiko Fujieda
  • Shuntaro Ando
  • Shinsuke Kondo
  • Kiyoto Kasai
  • 全て表示

17
1
開始ページ
360
終了ページ
記述言語
英語
掲載種別
研究論文(学術雑誌)
DOI
10.1186/s12888-017-1520-y
出版者・発行元
BIOMED CENTRAL LTD

Background: Personal recovery is increasingly recognised as an important outcome measure in mental health services. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-J) and test its validity and reliability.
Methods: The study comprised two stages that employed the cross-sectional and prospective cohort designs, respectively. We translated the questionnaire using a standard translation/back-translation method. Convergent validity was examined by calculating Pearson's correlation coefficients with scores on the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) and the Short-Form-8 Health Survey (SF-8). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to examine factorial validity. We used intraclass correlation and Cronbach's alpha to examine the test-retest and internal consistency reliability of the QPR-J's 22-item full scale, 17-item intrapersonal and 5-item interpersonal subscales. We conducted an EFA along with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
Results: Data were obtained from 197 users of mental health services (mean age: 42.0 years; 61.9% female; 49.2% diagnosed with schizophrenia). The QPR-J showed adequate convergent validity, exhibiting significant, positive correlations with the RAS and SF-8 scores. The QPR-J's full version, subscales, showed excellent test-retest and internal consistency reliability, with the exception of acceptable but relatively low internal consistency reliability for the interpersonal subscale. Based on the results of the CFA and EFA, we adopted the factor structure extracted from the original 2-factor model based on the present CFA.
Conclusion: The QPR-J is an adequately valid and reliable measure of the process of recovery among Japanese users with mental health services.

リンク情報
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1520-y
PubMed
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29115928
Web of Science
https://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=JSTA_CEL&SrcApp=J_Gate_JST&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=WOS:000414863700001&DestApp=WOS_CPL
ID情報
  • DOI : 10.1186/s12888-017-1520-y
  • ISSN : 1471-244X
  • PubMed ID : 29115928
  • Web of Science ID : WOS:000414863700001

エクスポート
BibTeX RIS